I thought I had posted this previously, but I cannot find it. If someone finds it is a duplicate of a previous post, please let me know.
Is it possible the real Síl Muiredaig fall under the R1b-BY20602 subclade of the R1b-FGC5939 likely Uí Briúin Aí, Maicne Eócháda Tírmchárnai clade? The R1b-FTT174 clade has somewhat upset the table below, but as it is a T2T variant, and we are only beginning to see and use T2T variants, I suspect the discovery of more T2T variants will balance out the clades to resemble the following table. Please see how this fits with the Mac Diarmata results at viewtopic.php?p=1659#p1659
This table was first generated on 2023 May 20.
R1b-BY20602 Síl Muiredaig?
-
- Suí Senchada
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat, 2021-Feb-06 4:56 pm
Re: R1b-BY20602 Síl Muiredaig?
The original of the chart was in an email but I don't believe it is in the forum.
I have a hunch this is possible because of the consistent separation of the two in the Annals:
R1b-BY20602, Uí Briúin Aí, Ui Conchobhair (split or graft?)
R1b-FGC5939, Síl Muiredaig, Maicne Eócháda Tírmchárnai clade.
As we stand, the chart is correct for the Mac Diarmata result.
I have a hunch this is possible because of the consistent separation of the two in the Annals:
R1b-BY20602, Uí Briúin Aí, Ui Conchobhair (split or graft?)
R1b-FGC5939, Síl Muiredaig, Maicne Eócháda Tírmchárnai clade.
As we stand, the chart is correct for the Mac Diarmata result.
Last edited by Webmaster on Fri, 2024-Sep-06 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Remove email link
Reason: Remove email link
Micheál Ó Rothláin
- Webmaster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Wed, 2019-Jun-26 2:47 pm
Re: R1b-BY20602 Síl Muiredaig?
Mike,
I think you meant R1b-Y166841 for the Uí Briúin, Maicne Cathail, which is where the Uí Conchobair Dond, Mac Magnusa, etc. families are located. This is parallel to the R1b-A260 Uí Briúin, Maicne Fergusa clade which the R1b-FGC5939 clade is under.
I am comfortable that there are enough Síl Muiredaig surnames under R1b-BY20602 in the correct relationships according to the genealogies to support this hypothesis.
I think you meant R1b-Y166841 for the Uí Briúin, Maicne Cathail, which is where the Uí Conchobair Dond, Mac Magnusa, etc. families are located. This is parallel to the R1b-A260 Uí Briúin, Maicne Fergusa clade which the R1b-FGC5939 clade is under.
I am comfortable that there are enough Síl Muiredaig surnames under R1b-BY20602 in the correct relationships according to the genealogies to support this hypothesis.
-
- Suí Senchada
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat, 2021-Feb-06 4:56 pm
Re: R1b-BY20602 Síl Muiredaig?
I stand corrected:
R1b-Y166841, Uí Briúin Aí, Ui Conchobhair (split or graft?)
R1b-BY20602, Síl Muiredaig
R1b-FGC5939, Maicne Eócháda Tírmchárnai clade.
I'm intrigued by Bart's label for Conchobar mac Tadg Mor (882) as Ua Conchobair about the time of R1b-BY20602. His supposed son Conchobar mac Tadg (973) is our surmised genetic break, could that have originally happened with R1b-Y166841 Uí Briúin, Maicne Cathail? later grafted beside Mael Ruanaid?
R1b-Y166841, Uí Briúin Aí, Ui Conchobhair (split or graft?)
R1b-BY20602, Síl Muiredaig
R1b-FGC5939, Maicne Eócháda Tírmchárnai clade.
I'm intrigued by Bart's label for Conchobar mac Tadg Mor (882) as Ua Conchobair about the time of R1b-BY20602. His supposed son Conchobar mac Tadg (973) is our surmised genetic break, could that have originally happened with R1b-Y166841 Uí Briúin, Maicne Cathail? later grafted beside Mael Ruanaid?
Micheál Ó Rothláin
- Webmaster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Wed, 2019-Jun-26 2:47 pm
Re: R1b-BY20602 Síl Muiredaig?
Mike,
The only thing we can say right now is that the SCE in the Ó Conchobair lineage likely occurred after Tadc inda Dúir Ó Conchobair, d. 956 AD, but before or with Tairdelbach Már Ó Conchobair, d. 1156 AD. I have my suspicion as to when it occurred, but it is merely a suspicion. Looking in that time frame the SCE MAY have occurred with Derbforgaill ingen Taidc mac Gilla Pátraic, wife of Tadc inda Eich Gil [https://www.dib.ie/biography/ua-conchob ... -gil-a8442], and mother of Áed inda Gaí Bernaig, making him the SCE [https://www.dib.ie/biography/ua-conchob ... pear-a8720]. She was married several times and had several children by different husbands. Again, this is pure speculation, and blaming it on the woman, just like Adam did with Eve.
The only thing we can say right now is that the SCE in the Ó Conchobair lineage likely occurred after Tadc inda Dúir Ó Conchobair, d. 956 AD, but before or with Tairdelbach Már Ó Conchobair, d. 1156 AD. I have my suspicion as to when it occurred, but it is merely a suspicion. Looking in that time frame the SCE MAY have occurred with Derbforgaill ingen Taidc mac Gilla Pátraic, wife of Tadc inda Eich Gil [https://www.dib.ie/biography/ua-conchob ... -gil-a8442], and mother of Áed inda Gaí Bernaig, making him the SCE [https://www.dib.ie/biography/ua-conchob ... pear-a8720]. She was married several times and had several children by different husbands. Again, this is pure speculation, and blaming it on the woman, just like Adam did with Eve.